Graham's Law:
allows us to calculate molar masses compared to the rate at which two gases effuse or diffuse.
Here is a sample problem:
Hydrogen gas diffuses 4.67 times as fast as another gas. What is the molar mass of the second gas?
To solve this, we'll make the unknown gas "a" and hydrogen gas "b". We'll also need to remember that the molar mass of hydrogen is 2.02 g/mol (since hydrogen comes as H2, not H).
For this problem then, Graham's Law looks like this:
Rearranging this equation to solve for the MM of "a" give us...
Substituting in, give us:
Squaring both sides give us: MMa = 44.09 g/mol.
However, with a small change, we can very different problems.
From physics, we know that rate = distance/time. If we substitute that into the equation, we get:
This format allows us to solve problems like:
If it takes helium 38.3 seconds to cross a 100.0 meter room, how long will it take oxygen to cross a 400.0 meter room?
For this problem, we'll let oxygen be gas "'a" and helium be gas "b". We also need to remember that oxygen gas is O2, not O.
First, we'll substitute in our gases:
Algebra ends up being the most problematic part of Graham's Law problems, so let's deal with that first. Dividing by fractions is ugly, so let's remember that dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprical.
That gives:
Next, we'll solve for time O2:
Then, we can substitute our numbers and solve:
Welcome to aBetterChemText
Why aBetterChemText?
What is aBetterChemtext? aBetterChemText is intended to be a new way to look at Chemistry. It is written in plain English to make it acc...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
During the time of the great Greek Philosophers, Plato was expounding on the idea that our world was but a shadowy reflection of a more pur...
-
It has been known since before humans were recording observations that very hot things glow. As we began to separate elements, we discover...
-
In the late 1800’s physics ran into a road-block in the understanding of the universe. Here’s the problem: if a generic thing (physicists c...
No comments:
Post a Comment