You may or may not have thought about
this issue, but a decision was made in the LDS for NO2 on the previous
page that has no justification whatsoever. When one pair was moved in
from an oxygen into a double bond with the nitrogen, that pair was moved
from the oxygen on the left side of the molecule. It could just as
easily have been moved from the oxygen on the right. This leads to two
possible LDS's.
It is tempting to think that these
are the same structure. After all, oxygen is oxygen. In other words, one
structure is just the other one viewed from the back (or in a mirror).
However, you will remember that not all oxygen atoms are the same. Some have
an extra neutron or two. Thus, if the two oxygen atoms are different isotopes
there is a distinct difference between the two structures.
In the first structure, the heavier
atom of oxygen has the double bond, while in the other, the double bond
involves the lighter oxygen. Knowing, as we do, that a bond is an
attraction that holds atoms together, we can easily see that a double
bond, with its extra electrons involved in the attraction would be
harder to pull apart (have a larger bond energy) and that such a bond
would be shorter since the atoms are pulled together with more force.
Logically then, if we could measure
the strength of the two bonds, or their length for that matter, we would
be able to determine which is which.
However, when the bonds are measured, they are both exactly the same length and exactly the same strength. To make matters worse, both bonds are stronger than single bonds, but are weaker than double bonds. Both bonds are shorter than single bonds, but longer than double bonds. Both bonds seem to be the equivalent of 1 and ½ bonds.
NOTE: This means that the Lewis Dots Structures are NOT correctly representing the truth!
However, when the bonds are measured, they are both exactly the same length and exactly the same strength. To make matters worse, both bonds are stronger than single bonds, but are weaker than double bonds. Both bonds are shorter than single bonds, but longer than double bonds. Both bonds seem to be the equivalent of 1 and ½ bonds.
NOTE: This means that the Lewis Dots Structures are NOT correctly representing the truth!
At first it was theorized that the
electrons were moving back and forth between the two structures, so that
the structure was resonating between the two extremes. As a result, this
property became known as resonance. This is unfortunate, since we have
since figured out that the molecule is NOT resonating. In fact the real molecule is
never either structure, but rather lies somewhere in between, with the
electrons spreading themselves out over the whole structure in a way
that LDS's cannot adequately show.
There are several commonly accepted
ways to show a LDS for a molecule such as NO2 that demonstrates
resonance. One is to represent the ½ part of each bond as a dashed line.
Generally this is accompanied by a dropping of the outer electron pairs
for convenience.
The other way to represent this
molecule in a LDS is to draw the two (or sometimes more) possible
structures and to place a double-headed arrow between them. This dates
from the time that it was believed that the molecule was resonating
between the various possibilities.
The first of these two choices, is more accurate when it comes to representing the actual bonds that exist between the atoms, although it must be acknowledged that the dashed line can sometime be half of a bond, and at other times a third of a bond.
The second method is more honest in terms of the electrons present in a molecule.
It will be up to your instructor to determine how he or she expects you to draw the LDS of such molecules.
Your Turn: (answers are here)
Try the following molecules and ions,
but be careful. Some involve more than two possibilities. In addition,
don't forget that ions need to be shown in large square brackets with
their charge. (the answers are here)
SO2
SO3
nitrate
nitrite
acetate
oxalate
SO3
nitrate
nitrite
acetate
oxalate
VSEPR Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment