In order to determine these values, we need to start with some data.
Let’s assume that a chemist runs the reaction 2 A + 3 B → C + 3 D three times.
Each time, she measures the starting concentrations of A and B and the rate of the reaction. The data she obtained is in the table below.
We know that the rate law has the form:
Now, to solve for x, we need to pick a pair of reactions in which the concentration of one reactant changes and the other does not. We'll use reactions 1 and 2.
So, for experiment #1, our equation looks like:
and for experiment #2, it looks like this:
If we divide these 2 (putting #2 over #1)
This can be simplified in two ways. we know both that
So, our equation simplifies down to:
This simplifies to
and then to Thus x = 2.
Calculating y is done the same way, but in this case we want to pick a pair of reactions where the concentration of B changes but the concentration of A does not.
In this example, that occurs between reactions 2 and 3.
We know that the rate law takes the form
Dividing the equation for reaction 3 by reaction 2 (and remembering that we already know that x=2) leaves us this:
As before, the k's will cancel as will the [A]'s, leaving: 1=[2]y.The only possible value of y is 0. That means that our rate law is:
Now that we know the values of the exponents (x and y), we can solve for k.
Welcome to aBetterChemText
Why aBetterChemText?
What is aBetterChemtext? aBetterChemText is intended to be a new way to look at Chemistry. It is written in plain English to make it acc...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
During the time of the great Greek Philosophers, Plato was expounding on the idea that our world was but a shadowy reflection of a more pur...
-
It has been known since before humans were recording observations that very hot things glow. As we began to separate elements, we discover...
-
In the late 1800’s physics ran into a road-block in the understanding of the universe. Here’s the problem: if a generic thing (physicists c...
No comments:
Post a Comment